Protect Pets, Save Birds

Raising awareness of the environmental impacts of pet flea and tick treatments.

Our campaign

We are calling on the government to strengthen the environmental risk assessment process for veterinary medicines used on our pets. Currently, flea and tick treatments can be purchased without prescription and, crucially, they are not subject to environmental risk assessments by regulatory bodies.
Through meetings with the Veterinary Medicines Directorate (VMD) as well as veterinary organisations such as the British Veterinary Association (BVA), we are working hard to ensure that the environmental impact of these medicines is recognised and addressed as a matter of urgency. Alongside lobbying the government, we are launching a public campaign to help raise awareness of the environmental risks associated with pet flea and tick treatments. To learn how you can protect songbirds whilst keeping your pets healthy, explore our infographic which includes simple, practical actions you can start today.
Read more in our guest blog
Why are songbirds at risk from veterinary medicines?

Did you know that most spot-on flea and tick treatments for pet dogs and cats contain fipronil and imidacloprid, pesticides banned for agricultural use in the UK and the EU because of their harmful effects on wildlife?

The impacts of these chemicals in the environment are widespread. Fipronil has been found in every UK river tested and imidacloprid in 70% of rivers, both at concentrations which can harm aquatic life. Terrestrial species are also at risk; just a teaspoon of imidacloprid is enough to kill 1.25 billion honeybees.

Research has found that these chemicals enter waterways both directly from dogs swimming in rivers and ponds, and indirectly via household drains when pet owners wash their hands, bathe their pets, or wash pet bedding.

What has our research into pesticides in birds’ nests found?

In January 2025, research by the University of Sussex, funded by SongBird Survival, found high levels of pesticides in blue tit and great tit nests lined with animal fur. 100% of nests contained fipronil, which was banned in the EU for agricultural use in 2013, and 89% contained imidacloprid, which was banned in the EU as a plant protection product in 2018.

The research found that blue tits and great tits are routinely exposed to pesticides in their nests and that higher pesticide concentrations were associated with increased chick mortality, including more unhatched eggs and dead chicks. With pet flea and tick treatments confirmed as the most likely source of contamination, the study raised serious concerns about the impacts of veterinary medicines on songbirds.

We have funded further research by the University of Sussex intowhether these pesticides are being transferred from birds’ nest linings totheir eggs and chicks. The latest results will be published soon.

Dr. Cannelle Tassin de Montaigu, Research and Associate Fellow at the University of Sussex and lead author of the research paper says:

“No nest was free from pesticides in our study, and this significant presence of harmful chemicals could be having devastating consequences on the UK’s bird populations.”

“Our research shows that based on the chemicals detected, veterinary flea and tick drugs are the most likely source of contamination. We undertook our research when it was safe to do so at the end of the breeding season, so the problem could in fact be much worse. This raises questions about the environmental impact of veterinary drugs and calls for a comprehensive environmental risk assessment of veterinary treatments.”
How can you protect your pets and save songbirds?

Keeping your cats and dogs safe from fleas and ticks is important for the health of both your pets and your household.

Current advice from the British VeterinaryAssociation (BVA) to vets is to avoid blanket treatment of flea and tick treatments, and instead risk assess what your pet needs. The BVA also recommends where possible and reasonable for vets to avoid prescribing topical products for pets which are likely to swim or be bathed.

  • Don’t put fur outside. If you treat your pets with spot-on flea and tick treatments, avoid discarding their fur outdoors after grooming as birds may use it to line their nests.
  • Check the label. Check the product leaflet or instructions for your flea and tick treatments to see if your pet can be washed or allowed to swim after application. Treatments can remain on fur for up to 28 days and be transferred to wastewater or rivers.
  • Speak to your vet. Consult your vet for advice and to risk-assess what treatment your pet needs with consideration for the environmental impact alongside animal welfare and human health. Vet Sustain, a group of veterinary professionals dedicated to championing the health of humans, animals and ecosystems, has guidance for vets on this process.

References

  • de Montaigu, C., Glauser, G., Guinchard, S. and Goulson, D. (2025) High prevalence of veterinary drugs in bird's nests. Science of The Total Environment, 964, 178439
  • Perkins, R. and Goulson, D. (2023) To flea or not to flea: survey of UK companion animal ectoparasiticide usage and activities affecting pathways to the environment. PeerJ, 11, e15561
  • Perkins, R., Barron, L., Glauser, G., Whitehead, M., Woodward, G. and Goulson, D. (2024) Down-the-drain pathways for fipronil and imidacloprid applied as spot-on parasiticides to dogs: Estimating aquatic pollution. Science of The Total Environment, 917, 170175
  • Perkins, R., Glauser, G. and Goulson, G. (2025) Swimming emissions from dogs treated with spot-on fipronil or imidacloprid: Assessing the environmental risk. Vet Record, 196(11), e5560
  • Perkins, R., Whitehead, M., Civil, W. and Goulson, D. (2021) Potential role of veterinary flea products in widespread pesticide contamination of English rivers. Science of The Total Environment, 755(1), 143560
  • Wan, N., Fu, L., Dainese, M., Pødenphant Kiær, L., Hu, Y., Xin, F., Goulson, D., Woodcock, B., Vanbergen, A., Spurgeon, D., Shen, S. and Scherber, C. (2025) Pesticides have negative effects on non-target organisms. Nature Communications, 16, 1360
  • Yoder, L., Egli, M., Richardson, A., Brooker, A., Perkins, R., Collins, T., Cardwell, J., Barron, L. and Waage, J. (2024) Dog swimming and ectoparasiticide water contamination in urban conservation areas: A case study on Hampstead Heath, London. Science of The Total Environment, 955